The Former President's Framework of Punishment and Favor

Trump's insatiable desire for retribution has rapidly morphed into a methodical system. During the past year, the president's rage and impulses have taken on the guise of government actions in ways analogous to historical repressive governments. Government figures who resist his demands are summarily fired and succeeded by devotees. Political figures who challenge him face legal action, trial and punishment. Opponents have been labeled under executive orders as “unpatriotic”, “opposed to religious values” and “against free markets”, and threatened with criminal charges as “security threats”.

Federal Agencies Restructured

Each situation involving prosecution of Trump's enemies and immunity for loyalists demonstrates its own distinct features. But, despite their particular character, they represent examples of what has developed as a deliberate technique. Those episodes are far from random. His purge of federal attorneys and FBI personnel, alongside his installation of loyalists in senior roles, started quickly, soon developed a consistency, and has now been molded into a structure. Federal prosecutors and the law enforcement agency have been remade into political bodies under his clear direction to execute his wishes. Wrongdoing has been made normal. It constitutes the apparatus of revenge.

Management is focused with penalizing the President's perceived enemies than they are with safeguarding our national security.

Internal the System

The foundation of this system has been uncovered in the court filing of several previous top Federal Bureau officials submitted in late summer in the federal court in the capital against agency head an administration figure and top lawyer another official for illegal termination in “a campaign of payback against them for what Defendants deemed to be a inability to demonstrate adequate political loyalty”. According to the filing that a former acting director, the ex- acting FBI director, recounts a exchange in which the director “publicly admitted the unlawfulness of his actions”.

Driscoll had attempted to protect FBI agents from being terminated, the filing claims. He told him that “they” – understood by the official to be the presidential administration and justice department – had instructed him to fire anyone who they considered as having been involved in a criminal investigation against the president. The document adds: “He stated that he had to terminate the people his superiors told him to remove, because his capacity to hold his own job was contingent on the dismissal of the officials who were involved in investigations involving the chief executive. He commented that there was no option he or him could do to halt these or any other dismissals, because ‘the bureau tried to incarcerate the leader in jail and he recalls it clearly.’” After he advised Patel he was breaking the bureau's own internal rules, the director reportedly said “he understood that and he was aware the nature of the swift terminations were likely illegal”.

Widespread Effects

After his claimed admission to Driscoll, the DoJ and the Federal Bureau have been weakened and redirected for his retribution system. Several of the bureau's senior executives were dismissed or forced out in the early weeks of the presidency. About 4,500 professional attorneys at DoJ have taken a “deferred resignation program”. At least seven DoJ lawyers, including those in the Manhattan division, resigned in protest over what they considered as ideological pressure in abandoning the legal action against the New York City mayor, the mayor, in as a trade for his assistance with Trump's federal agency detentions of foreign nationals. The anti-corruption unit of DoJ, which manages ethical violations, has been cut down to two attorneys. The civil rights division has been decimated: 70% of its employees has departed. A third of senior leaders at the department have left. The division upholding environmental law has lost a majority its management.

Favors and Punishments

Concerning the Adams case, the acting US attorney for the southern district of New York, she, quit in dissent against what she characterized as the “exchange”. The border official, Trump's “enforcement chief,” appeared as the implementer with the mayor on a media outlet to declare: “Unless he complies, I'll be back in NYC.”. And, another figure, earlier the justice department figure and a ex-lawyer, who negotiated the agreement, was awarded an appellate federal judgeship, a possible pathway to the judicial branch.

His immunity for offenses committed while in government, granted by the unprecedented ruling of the conservative on the highest court, thus thwarting his criminal case over the Capitol riot and maintaining his public standing for the national vote, is the basis on which he depends to defend his loyalists. Given this protection, he has been freed to permit corruption. The effect of the judicial ruling saturates his presidency and the GOP completely. Trump v United States has metastasized. In the words of the former president's administration lawyer the figure said about the Watergate

Michael Ward
Michael Ward

Digital archivist and historian specializing in preserving cultural heritage through innovative curation methods.